Mainstream Media SILENT About Conservative Targeted Political Terrorism

In recent events Democrats have been in an uproar over the bombs that were sent to Donald Trumps critics. A man has already been arrested in connection to the act, it has also been acknowledged as an act of political terrorism, it has been acknowledged that he was a huge fan of Donald Trump. What the mainstream media is unlikely to say is that he was arrested for another bomb threat in 2002. The man obviously has a reoccurring pattern of behavior. It has been denounced as an act of political terrorism even by Donald trump

What is not a mystery was Daniel Frisiello’s intent. Never heard of him? That’s not surprising considering he was barely covered by any mainstream media. He JUST pleaded guilty to sending a white powder to Donald Trump’s sons October 17, 2018. Even though the substance was not lethal, this was also an act of political terrorism. However it wasn’t covered as an act of political terrorism, it was simply covered as “sending a white powder” to Donald Trump’s sons.

Why this was political terrorism:

  • The targets were tragically chosen
  • The perpetrator used fear and intimidation as a tool to try to obtain a political goal

These two characteristics qualify Cesar Altieri Sayoc as a political terrorist as well even if the bombs were completely fake. The only difference is Cesar is being acknowledged for what he is, Daniel Frisiello is being ignored!

When you google his name you find next to nothing when it comes to mainstream sources. This event was taken extremely lightly, it received next to no attention. Could you imagine the attention the media would have given to Obama’s family had someone sent a powdered letter to one of his daughters, it had reached her, and she inhaled some of the particles? Regardless of the content being fatal or not, the outrage would have been continuous and it would be forever reached for in future discussions to come as a counter argument.

If we are to unify the country, as Democrats spout we should, then there is a responsibility on their parts to condemn ALL political terrorists equally regardless of who is being targeted! There is also a responsibility to acknowledge these people as individuals and not apply their personalities to the general population. This is what Donald Trump means when he says the mainstream media needs to get its act together.

 

 

Advertisements

Should You Be Able To Sue the Media For Damages For Labeling a Person a Survivor or Victim BEFORE a Conviction?

The presumption of innocence used to be taken very seriously in this country. Recently, however, it has been taken so lightly that a mere accusation has turned the courts into a system of a presumption of guilt. The media has not helped in this situation and in the movement of #metoo any woman who has made an accusation is too often immediately labelled by the media as a ‘Survivor’ or a ‘victim‘.

When a paper is writing about any other criminal act the word ‘alleged’ must be used, the presumption of innocence is taken seriously or else the accused could sue for damages if they’re found innocent in the end.

It is a different story with today’s sexual accusations, as soon as a person makes their accusation the media labels the person either a ‘Survivor’ or ‘victim’ but does not place the word ‘allegedly’ before these words anymore. Is this right? It is apparent that we now instinctively label an accuser as a ‘victim’ or ‘survivor’, but does this word break the boundaries of presumption of innocence? Many times the process of discovery is just as dirty as the accusation itself, could these how we paint someone cast a shadow on the outcome of their lives? Placing doubt in the minds of enough people IS a political influence itself.

One can only be a survivor if one is FIRST a victim, one can ONLY be a victim if the person they’ve accused has been convicted, calling an accuser a ‘survivor’ without the accused being convicted is a violation of the accuser’s right to due process. So technically you should be able to sue for damages for anyone who used that word or the word ‘victim’ in connection to the accuser’s name for a violation of his or her due-process. If you can sue because a paper does not use the words “allegedly” in violation of due process (which people have) then you should be able to sue for referring to a woman as a survivor/victim BEFORE her alleged perpetrator has been tried and convicted. Anything before this should be considered defamation. She doesn’t become a victim UNTIL he is found guilty.

I petition that any news media channel that uses the word victim or survivor in connection with an alleged perpetrator before they are convicted should be found guilty of Defamation of Character or liable for any damages caused. Apologies not accepted- it’s too easy to be sorry.

 

 

‘Ring Hollow’: Democrats Still Fail to See Why People Are Angry With Them

No matter what the president does, it’s like he can never win. Even though it’s been the Democrats that have been the increasingly violent through out these times, the President has been blamed for these attacks. The Democrats are complete hypocrites, they don’t understand the reasons behind why these suspicious packages were sent in the first place. He has currently condemned those who sent suspicious packages to Democrat leaders and called for the parties to put their differences aside, but it hasn’t stopped the Democrats from condemning him still.

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, in a joint statement, refused to set their political differences aside, regardless of the fact the President extended an Olive Branch.

“Time and time again, the President has condoned physical violence and divided Americans with his words and his actions…”,    “…dictators around the world who murder their own citizens, and referring to the free press as the enemy of the people… “, “President Trump’s words ring hollow until he reverses his statements that condone acts of violence,” – Parts of The Joint Statement Issued by Chuck Schumer and Nanci Pelosi

Let me note, that all Presidents of the past have made their fair share of contributions when it comes to cozy-ing up to dictators that enforced an inhumane standard for its common citizens. This is common-place, it is a must when it comes to negotiations and every leader has their own way of forming relationships with these foreign adversaries. What we ask is, did we get anything out of it? Trump is one of the few who actually got something in return. (Which I will write on and link here in the near future).

It is exactly this type of denial, and their failure to acknowledge their own arrogance that has pushed someone over the edge. I don’t condone what this person did, however, they fail to acknowledge that they are the main factor behind the polarization in this country. It started the moment he got elected, they never had a problem with the electoral process until he won.

Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, and other well-known Democrats have invoked violence. Countless Democrat Hollywood stars have called for ‘resistance’ (a militia term) through violence, military coups to overthrow the government, and even the assassination of the President. Their failed acknowledgement in these activities is what is driving people from their party.

May I also point out, that in their refusal to put the past in the past, that they are the party that keeps the violence in the present. The president has acknowledged the violence, and even if he does NOT acknowledge everything in the past (which I understand why they don’t like real jokes they ARE the punchline), if he is making an “attempt” to wash away his supposed ‘sin’ (which I see none from my point of view to begin with) wouldn’t the opposing party with the alleged moral superiority attempt to meet in the middle? Yet, these politicians have made no attempt to acknowledge this “good act” and have instead, have insisted on pointing fingers. A sign that they have no intention to cooperate, even IF given the opportunity.

The more they try to place the division and violent behavior on the Republicans, the more they point fingers without acknowledging the part their own supporters and representatives are playing, the more their party will shrink.

Twitter Bans Alex Jones, A Few Questions For Them

Twitter has, as we all knew they would eventually do, suspended Alex Jones’ account and banned him from Twitter.

https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1037806327584776193

What was the reason for this banning? Apparently, Twitter accused Alex Jones of violating their “abusive behavior policy”.

This is the foundation of the policy that Twitter claims Alex Jones violated.

Basic POlicy

However, the left views “abuse” differently than what is realistic. Realistically abuse is being targeted by someone, involuntarily having to submit to them in some way, and having an inability to fight back.

On Twitter, onlookers voluntarily engaged with Alex Jones and viewed his content. They also had just as much freedom to block him as soon as they made an account. Realistically if the left had a distaste for his content they would have taken the two seconds it took out of their day to simply block him and never heard from him again. If a person voluntarily engaged with Alex Jones with full knowledge that he has had signs of what Twitter calls “abusive behavior” in the past, are they not consenting to the possibility of their engagement also being hostile? Not saying that he WAS hostile, many who reported him were just as hostile as they accused him of being. So the reality is, they weren’t mad at his content being offensive, so much as they were angry at him having a voice at all. They were angry that he had a right to speak his mind!

Can we really say anyone is abusive if the party in question is being voluntarily approached by their opponents? Is the approach of a person’s platform or reply to their tweet not technically consent to their alleged ‘hate speech’ (I do not believe in the left’s version of hate speech)?

However Twitter seems to think, like many leftists, that a person doesn’t need to be the target of the content for the speaker to be considered abusive.

screenshot-help.twitter.com-2018.09.06-22-01-31

In Twitter’s own words, as long as there is a possibility you’ve offended someone, there is a possibility your account is getting suspended. Depending on the demand, Twitter will ban you based on the amount of people who deem your content as hateful.

And Twitter is filled with little cupcakes waiting to press that ‘Report’ button.

This leads me to question, does Twitter have the right to even make this standard on their platform since twitter considers itself a platform and NOT a media? Yes, they’re a private company, but there are laws when it comes to platforms. They claim not to be a media simply because they don’t produce content. However, if they regulate the content that IS produced, can they not be established AS a publishing platform regardless of owning the actual creators who are producing the content? And if they are truly a free speech platform, do they have a right to regulate content like this at all within the sovereignty of the United States? In either direction, did they have a right to rip the rug out from under Alex Jones’ feet over unfounded claims he violated their policy? Does he not have the right to see the evidence, a right to dispute the claims?

When it comes to their platform, they’re either one or the other. It is a slippery slope and they cannot crawl their way out of the rabbit hole they, and other social media platforms, have created for themselves.

 

The Left-Wing Media Disrespects Mollie Tibbetts

Mollie Tibbetts was a college student from Iowa state University from a rural area. She went missing a little over a month ago on July 18th, 2018. She was front page news for a long time. Her family and friends fought hard to keep her at the center of attention so that the public wouldn’t forget about her. The only clue investigators had was her fit-bit information, a black SUV on a security camera, and the fact that people she knew had been excluded as suspects.

Just recently it was revealed that a body was found, the media was still sympathetic, still posting her full name in their headlines. However, it was later revealed that he was an illegal alien from Mexico and the tide had turned. Headlines that once bore the name “Mollie Tibbetts” read “a college girl”. The perpetrator’s status as an illegal was dulled in some article titles to ‘undocumented immigrant’, and in some cases completely extinguished to the title of ‘immigrant’.

Business Insider Before They Knew Mollie Tibbetts’ Perpetrator’s Immigration Status

screenshot-www.businessinsider.com-2018-08-22-13-03-40

This is their story after they found out about her perpetrator’s immigration status

screenshot-www.businessinsider.com-2018-08-22-12-59-41

This is the New York Times’ Story, they didn’t use illegal OR undocumented

screenshot-www.nytimes.com-2018-08-22-13-23-17

 

The Far Left Is Creeping Up Even On Some of the Most Conservative Campuses

Featured

I was picking up my school books for this fall at the local University known as Quincy University. It is a Catholic Private School, meaning it is probably going to be as conservative and as open-minded as I’m going to find within fifty miles. They are pretty even keeled and very pro-free speech, which some find hard to believe when I tell them this, because they’ve never seen anything beyond their own town. The amount of support it had for Trump was through the roof.

However, even on a campus that’s insulted with a conservative town, the left is working its way into targeting its next generation. Probably right under this towns nose, these books are signs that the left making its way towards mass indoctrinations:

0815181102-000815181104-00

This would make sense if these were in the school library, but these are books that are in the book store. They were books specifically there to be picked up because they were requested to be used by professors in their classes. I realize today it’s considered a “feminist’s” world, which I don’t agree with, but to have an entire class on it? However, it is a private campus. Yet the second picture is where I get concerned. The fact that this was even on anyones list says that there is a problem, yes there can be a conversation, but to have an entire book for the class? That’s an over reach.

Hate speech is free speech, if you don’t like that speech, then speak your mind. The only way to fight hate speech is with more speech. The moment you start to even think the answer is to close your mouth, our country is dead.

If this is a Catholic Campus, think of how bad a non-religious campus that runs on public funding is. Think of how tied down those students voices are, if this is just a sample of what I’m expecting here.

 

Social Media Has No Business Parenting US: Back OFF!

Featured

There was a point in time when you hit the age of eighteen, you were on your own. It’s funny how our lives are mere pawns to be used in war at eighteen, yet you need to use your parent’s information for financial aid all the way up until you’re twenty-five unless you divorce them. I had to wait until I was twenty five years old to go to college, I couldn’t receive the financial aid that I needed and I didn’t know that something as absurd as divorcing your parents even existed. I have been on my own since I was eighteen and I have received next to zero help from either of my parents.

People make conscious choices to do things, this isn’t just a matter of free speech, it’s also a freedom to choose what I listen to. Sorry, but the last person who tried to control everything in my life ended up not seeing me again. I firmly believe in the freedom of choice, even if it means hearing things I don’t necessarily agree with. By deeming certain content as “hateful”, they are becoming the parent I didn’t ask for. The parent that I don’t want, need, and quite frankly am insulted to be given. I am not a child to shepherded around.

Banning Alex Jones is like placing parental content filters on America’s computers as though he’s rated ‘R’. It’s insulting to think that you supposedly know what’s best for me to see. You see it as ‘hateful’, yet you don’t seem to have a problem with the Facebook page Death To America consisting of 1,347 people when I last counted it, Twitter having countless accounts registered under Death To America, they’re shaddowbanning conservative accounts.

screenshot-twitter.com-2018-08-10-23-38-17

However, this doesn’t seem to disturb these social media billionaires, they’re just practicing their right to religious practice. Thankfully, twitter hasn’t completely gone off the deep end and is one of the few social medias that hasn’t botted Alex Jones off yet.

Youtube doesn’t seem to mind not listing videos according to what’s popular now either. According to Mark Dice, new algorithms now make sure that what they think comes before what you’re looking for, even if the title is written word for word:

This one reveals YouTube puts mainstream media first instead of by who gets the most views (whom they just recently banned anyways and haven’t changed the algorithms)

This one reveals how YouTube intentionally scrambles your search results try to get you think like you do.

Here’s an example of how this works, there’s also another algorithm that’s gone up. If you search a controversial subject, it will post a link with mainstream beliefs linked to them to try to ‘unbrainwash’ you.

Social media is a platform to voice all opinions. If it were a place for kids to simply play on it, you wouldn’t have to verity you were a certain age. Since when was it legal to shut down another person’s right to publish and distribute to his/her audience? When did corporations have the right to take my chosen media source away from me as though I were some child that had to be moderated? It’s funny how you have to be 18 to hold a youtube account (13 with a parent’s permission), but can still be parented like you’re some little kid that can’t take a few shots of reality.

Alex Jones, though I don’t agree with him and do take him for a nut job at times, should have his accounts reinstated. He hasn’t hurt anyone, hasn’t incited violence of any kind, if the most he has done is presented conspiracy theories then do nothing more than voice your opinion as to why they are conspiracy theories. You do nothing more than bring validity to his claims by cutting off his voice. If  social media is not in fact social then I will treat you like any other controlling parent, divorce you. These are class action lawsuits waiting to happen, people don’t like having their voices cut off, or the content they love taken away from them by force.

Eleven Children Rescued in New Mexico Were Being Trained For School Shootings

Featured

There was a frantic search for a little boy who had allegedly been taken by his father. Siraj Wahhaj, 39, was suspected of kidnapping his three year old son who was disabled and was in the custody of his grandfather. The chase led to New Mexico, where low and behold, Police found eleven other children, in a compound in the middle of the desert. Without water, disgusting conditions, and practically starving to death.

When this was initially reported, the story was that three women and two men were arrested after finding them with eleven children. However, they only showed the mugshots of the men and the horrible living conditions. Being that we live in a rather feminist society I didn’t think much of it at first.

Mugshot1Mugshot2Horribleconditions1Horribleconditions2

Then, I ran across a blog post on facebook saying that the New Mexico bunker was really a place to train future school shooters. I like looking into these things, only because I like to get my facts straight to know in the future. I found a news article that linked to an article from the UK that showed the mugshots to the three women that were apprehended. Now I see why CNN didn’t put them in their original post, when they say they “asked the captain to confirm a Muslim connection” in their second article (which was in no way in their first) this should have given it away at the very beginning.

 

 

Of course this doesn’t show the initial intent behind the abduction or that Islam played a part, but with holding information from a story is lying to the public. Nobody said that there were suspicions that Islam could be involved, no, they completely withheld the information completely. I had to find out through a blog circulating on social media, and confirm it through a source, which at the time, was only posted through a different country’s media. Even though the media DID eventually cover it, it was extremely defiant and dishonest in its initial presentation of all the facts. If an alternative news source hadn’t covered it, I doubt there would have been any mention of it at all.


In doing more research, I ran across a video that basically spells out everything in capital letters.

This explains the media’s silence and their reluctance to talk about it afterwards, it comes to show they were silent even when the curtain was pulled back. Even when we thought we knew everything, they were still ‘keeping us in the dark’. It comes to show how dishonest the media has truly become.

 

Trump’s Hollywood Star Is Getting Removed

It’s been vandalized at least twice, with the most recent being the most destructive. Now the snobs in Hollywood, have voted to having it removed. However their vote actually means nothing because they have no jurisdiction. In the statement released to CNN:

“The West Hollywood City Council did not pass the resolution because Donald Trump is a conservative or a Republican. Earning a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame is an honor. When one belittles and attacks minorities, immigrants, Muslims, people with disabilities or women — the honor no longer exists.”- West Hollywood Mayor John Duran

However, all of the previous reasons for removing the star are false. Many of these accusations are based on statements the media has taken out of context.

  1. Trump has never “attacked” minorities, the media just likes to put off as though he does. Todays generation have never been scorned by the true wrath of full fledged racism, and have been falsely led to believe that todays culture is what racism looks like.
  2. Trump has been misquoted for calling Mexicans rapists. When Trump was giving his acceptance speech he made a continuing statement where he stated Mexico wasn’t sending their best. He made a pause in his sentence and said “their rapist” when referring to who Mexico was sending and continued with, “and some I assume are good people”. However, the media misquoted him and changed it to where it sounded like, where many Americans today not only believe what they hear but are horrible at catching grammatical errors, “they’re rapists”. He never called Mexicans rapists, he was simply stating a blunt fact, Mexico is sending rapists over our southern border. Of course, the left likes to pretend like rapists don’t cross our borders, however, when you read their source it’s one tweet by a person who’s allegedly been with the caravan for 12 days. Do you really think anything is going to happen with a news crew on site? Realistically, illegals with criminal records who have been arrested for rape have been deported more than once. This is the reality, deal with it. Being that many of these people come from South America, they’re allowing these people to not only cross through their southern border, but to cross through their northern border as well. I’d blame it on Mexico too.
  3. When Obama left the White House, his administration left a list of countries that were considered ‘hot spots’ for terrorism. The “Travel Ban” was based on these countries. India is the largest Muslim country in the world, and it was not on the list.
  4. They’re NOT considered “immigrants” when they cross the border Illegally, they’re considered CRIMINALS.
  5. There was a popular controversy that Trump made fun of a disabled reporter. Of course they used Trump physically mocking him as evidence of specifically making fun of someone with a disability. However, if you do a little research, you’ll find Trump physically mocks everyone in this fashion. This isn’t evidence that he was targeting the disabled, if anything he was holding the reporter to the same standards as any other reporter. If the news hadn’t reported him as having been disabled, I don’t think anyone would have actually given his disability a second thought. Trump wasn’t making fun of his disability he was criticizing a criticizer in a way that criticizes ALL his critics.
  6. I was homeless for four years and I’ve also sold alcohol, during this time period, I’ve heard men talk talk the exact way the President has. He wasn’t talking presidentially because he wasn’t running for president, he was talking like a guy. In my experience, women will do practically anything for a man to get into his wallet. Even Dave Chappelle clarified the President’s statement on Saturday Night Live, “Sexual assault? It wasn’t. He said, ‘And when you’re a star, they let you do it.’ That phrase implies consent. I just don’t like the way the media twisted that whole thing. Nobody questioned it,” It was this incident that caused him to express his regret for voting for Clinton as he saw the media spin articles out of context.

I love how Hollywood is removing his star based on its “superior” values. Specifically when it comes to the issue of women. The most recent Trump star was completely obliterated, which is funny, because not even a few feet from it another star lied on the ground. Not that particularly believe in the #MeToo movement, I think it’s nothing more than a movement where false accusers are free to run rampant. However, now that we’re on the subject of Hollywood, morality, and women, I feel obligated to ask… when is Hollywood planning to remove this star?

KevinspaceyStar

It wasn’t harmed even though there’s an open court case of sexual assault happening right now. It wasn’t even a few inches away from the Trump star. What about Bill Cosby where he was convicted of three counts of rape? His star is still there, yet it hasn’t been removed. Again, I don’t necessarily believe these men are guilty only because Feminism has gotten so out of hand that the mere accusation of sexual assault or rape can lead to a conviction. However, it is a clear case of a double standard when it concerns men, usually just being men, yet only this one man is being picked out.

What’s interesting is no one in my generation actually cares to know the history behind this stretch of tiled walkway. It has names printed on it that date clear back to the 1930s, 40s and 50s. If you were to snap your fingers and request that true racists be erased from the pavement, half of them would probably be gone. However, most of the community probably doesn’t even stop to think about the names they walk on day by day. All they know, is they hate Trump with a passion. If it were actually true about dropping stars due to morality, what about this guys star?

Johnwayne

I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.”– John Wayne, Playboy Interview May 1971

If you’re going to get rid of stars for “high morals” you might want to start making a list. …..Or you could admit to the real reason, you just hate the President.

 

Steve Ybarra’s Story, Domestic Violence

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTENT MAY BE DISTURBING TO SOME

Steve Ybarra is a Mexican-American man in his thirties who is going through a Domestic Violence situation with his ex, Michelle Ybarra. According to documentation through video, pictures, and witness testimony, Steve Ybarra has been a victim of his abuser for the past three years of their marriage. He is currently in the middle of a divorce and is in the middle of a custody battle of their young son, Leo.


Due to the video being so long, I’m writing out Ybarra’s story. You can watch the full video at the Bottom but it is long and the Microphone STINKS!


Ybarra got married to Michelle, who already had a child from a previous relationship. They were married for a little over three years, during at which time, his friend was telling him he was being abused. It took some time for him to believe it, but over a course of years, with consistent fits and bursts of anger he was convinced.

He eventually began documenting her outrageous behavior through time. He would get extreme over reactions. Being that he is five foot eleven and nearly pure muscle, why would he have anything to fear? During their arguments, he said that she would take both the children and leave, no matter what the whether was like. Taking a baby, barely a year old, can be hazardous to their health if not properly heated.  Making things over dramatic, when they clearly didn’t have to be.

They hit rock bottom at one point, they became homeless and were allegedly living in a hotel where Ybarra decided to take their son and move in with a friend in Quincy Illinois. Michelle filed for divorce and claimed he was cheating on her. In her statement she claimed that he was prostituting himself, he allows his son to play with guns, she isn’t comfortable with him being around his father, and that there are pictures pinned to the court document of pictures he sent to her via text message.

MICHELLE’S Court Statement

37806162_429911907493152_4928214044306833408_n

Picture Attached To Michelle’s Court Statement Allegedly Received Via Text Without Her Present

37767199_429912034159806_1690383180768477184_n-1

It was revealed that Michelle was lying, and not only did she not receive the pictures via text message, but the content didn’t come from a picture at all. The picture that was included was an edited screen shot of a video clip. There were no guns included in the clip and they were merely parts of guns. Michelle claimed to have disapproved of her son playing with the gun parts, but conveniently failed to mention she had cropped herself out of the photo she had provided as evidence. Notice, in the following picture the open screen marked “properties” the date of ‘5/31/2018’, Steve left June 11, 2018. The woman in the picture, is none other than Michelle Ybarra.

37820076_429914474159562_2900970647163240448_n

Tampering with evidence is obstruction of Justice and is FELONY in Illinois!

Steve also held three jobs in Quincy at the time of his alleged prostitution. Two of them, at night and another at all hours, giving him no real opportunity. Just a thought, you can’t claim someone is cheating on you, then claim they’re out prostituting themselves, people who cheat have money already and people who prostitute don’t need three jobs.

Michelle is psychologically disturbed:

 

 

 

Verbally Abusive to Children

 

 

 

 

Racially Discriminatory (you have to turn this one up it’s hard to hear)

 

 

 

 

Then Turns to Physical Assault

 

 

 

37770439_429647380852938_2204462019883565056_n

received_394611164356560Scratchmarks Outer ThighScratchMarksInner ArmScratchMarksBackof Neck

Why does this matter? He’s big enough to defend himself!

She BROKE THE LAW! She needs to be PUNISHED he should be treated with just as much respect as any other victim of abuse; he respected her in the fact that he didn’t knock her out.

 

(This is VERY low, the microphone is VERY poor sorry)